- Respiratory level tracking with visual biofeedback for consistent breath-hold level with potential application in image-guided interventions
- Non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
- The 2018 correlative microscopy techniques roadmap
- Considering the biology of late recurrences in selecting patients for extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer
- Enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with eating disorders: A systematic review
- Fish Intake, Circulating Mercury and Mortality in Renal Transplant Recipients
- Association Between Subjective Tinnitus and Cervical Spine or Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review
- Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale
- Hatha yoga for acute, chronic and/or treatment-resistant mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- A Close Examination of the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Depressive Symptoms
Most Used Journals
Stump sensibility in children with upper limb reduction deficiency.
J Rehabil Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):51-8
Authors: Reinkingh M, Reinders-Messelink HA, Dijkstra PU, Maathuis KG, van der Sluis CK
OBJECTIVES: To compare stump sensibility in children with upper limb reduction deficiency with sensibility of the unaffected arm and hand. In addition, to evaluate the associations between stump sensibility, stump length and activity level.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SUBJECTS: Children and young adults aged 6-25 years with upper limb reduction deficiency.
METHODS: Threshold of touch was measured with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, stereognosis was measured with the Shape-Texture Identification test and kinaesthesia and activity level was measured with the Child Amputee Prosthetics Project – Functional Status Inventory and the Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index.
RESULTS: A total of 31 children with upper limb reduction deficiency (mean age 15 years, 3 prosthesis wearers) were investigated. The threshold of touch of the stump circumference was lower (indicating higher sensibility) than of the unaffected arm (p = 0.006), hand (p = 0.004) and stump end-point (p = < 0.001). Long stumps had higher threshold of touch (indicating lower sensibility) than short stumps (p = 0.046). Twenty-nine children recognized 1 or more shapes or textures with the stump. Kinaesthesia in the affected and unaffected sides was comparable. Sensibility was not correlated with activity level.
CONCLUSION: Threshold of touch, stereognosis and kinaesthesia of the affected sides were excellent. Threshold of touch of the stump circumference was lower (indicating higher sensibility) than of the unaffected arm and hand. High stump sensibility may clarify good functioning in the children without prostheses and contribute to prosthesis rejection.
PMID: 24036887 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]