- Patients' appreciation of pre-implant augmentation of the severely resorbed maxilla with calvarial or anterior iliac crest bone: a randomized controlled trial
- Calcified or ossified benign soft tissue lesions that may simulate malignancy
- CMR feature tracking left ventricular strain-rate predicts ventricular tachyarrhythmia, but not deterioration of ventricular function in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot
- The use of stretching devices for treatment of trismus in head and neck cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial
- The effects of oxygen concentration on cell death, anti-oxidant transcription, acute inflammation, and cell proliferation in precision-cut lung slices
- Continuous versus intermittent infusion of cefotaxime in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing plasma concentrations
- Onset and transition of and recovery from adverse development: Study methodology
- Social competence in newly diagnosed pediatric brain tumor patients
- Partners' adjustment to older workers' retirement: testing the role of preretirement expectations in a 10-year panel study
- Gene network approach reveals co-expression patterns in nasal and bronchial epithelium
Most Used Journals
Author Archives: Poot AM, Diercks GF, Kramer D, Schepens I, Klunder G, Hashimoto T, Borradori L, Jonkman MF, Pas HH
Laboratory diagnosis of paraneoplastic pemphigus.
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;169(5):1016-24
Authors: Poot AM, Diercks GF, Kramer D, Schepens I, Klunder G, Hashimoto T, Borradori L, Jonkman MF, Pas HH
BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is a multiorgan disease characterized by antibodies against plakins, desmogleins and the α2-macroglobulin-like-1 (A2ML1) protein, in association with an underlying neoplasm. Accurate diagnosis relies on the demonstration of these autoantibodies in serum.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of different laboratory techniques in the serological diagnosis of PNP.
METHODS: We performed immunoblotting, envoplakin (EP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on rat bladder, radioactive immunoprecipitation and a nonradioactive combined immunoprecipitation-immunoblot assay. Additional assays included BP180 ELISA and BP230 ELISA. We included the sera of 19 patients with PNP and 40 control subjects.
RESULTS: The sensitivities were 63% for anti-EP ELISA, 74% for rat bladder IIF, 89% for immunoblotting, 95% for radioactive immunoprecipitation and 100% for nonradioactive immunoprecipitation. Specificities ranged from 86% to 100%. The BP180 and BP230 ELISAs had low sensitivity and specificity for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblot showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The analysis of sequential PNP sera showed that antibody titres may decrease over time, possibly resulting in negative outcomes for EP ELISA and rat bladder IIF studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection of autoantibodies against EP and periplakin, or A2ML1 by immunoprecipitation is most sensitive for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblotting is equally sensitive and highly specific, and represents an alternative valuable and relatively easy approach for the serological diagnosis of PNP.
PMID: 23796242 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]