- Equivalent Long-term Transplantation Outcomes for Kidneys Donated After Brain Death and Cardiac Death: Conclusions From a Nationwide Evaluation
- Quantification of surfactant protein D (SPD) in human serum by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)
- White matter architecture in major depression with anxious distress symptoms
- The Wayfinding Questionnaire: A clinically useful self-report instrument to identify navigation complaints in stroke patients
- Parkinson's disease and long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution: A matched case-control study in the Netherlands
- Early electroencephalography for outcome prediction of postanoxic coma: A prospective cohort study
- A case of concomitant pulmonary tuberculosis and mucormycosis in an insulin-dependent diabetic patient
- Association between social factors and performance during Functional Capacity Evaluations: a systematic review
- Survival after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
- A next-generation sequencing method for gene doping detection that distinguishes low levels of plasmid DNA against a background of genomic DNA
Most Used Journals
Author Archives: Poot AM, Diercks GF, Kramer D, Schepens I, Klunder G, Hashimoto T, Borradori L, Jonkman MF, Pas HH
Laboratory diagnosis of paraneoplastic pemphigus.
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;169(5):1016-24
Authors: Poot AM, Diercks GF, Kramer D, Schepens I, Klunder G, Hashimoto T, Borradori L, Jonkman MF, Pas HH
BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP) is a multiorgan disease characterized by antibodies against plakins, desmogleins and the α2-macroglobulin-like-1 (A2ML1) protein, in association with an underlying neoplasm. Accurate diagnosis relies on the demonstration of these autoantibodies in serum.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of different laboratory techniques in the serological diagnosis of PNP.
METHODS: We performed immunoblotting, envoplakin (EP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on rat bladder, radioactive immunoprecipitation and a nonradioactive combined immunoprecipitation-immunoblot assay. Additional assays included BP180 ELISA and BP230 ELISA. We included the sera of 19 patients with PNP and 40 control subjects.
RESULTS: The sensitivities were 63% for anti-EP ELISA, 74% for rat bladder IIF, 89% for immunoblotting, 95% for radioactive immunoprecipitation and 100% for nonradioactive immunoprecipitation. Specificities ranged from 86% to 100%. The BP180 and BP230 ELISAs had low sensitivity and specificity for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblot showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. The analysis of sequential PNP sera showed that antibody titres may decrease over time, possibly resulting in negative outcomes for EP ELISA and rat bladder IIF studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection of autoantibodies against EP and periplakin, or A2ML1 by immunoprecipitation is most sensitive for PNP. The combination of rat bladder IIF and immunoblotting is equally sensitive and highly specific, and represents an alternative valuable and relatively easy approach for the serological diagnosis of PNP.
PMID: 23796242 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]