- Assessing intestinal permeability in Crohn's disease patients using orally administered 52Cr-EDTA
- Adaptation, validity and reliability of the modified painDETECT questionnaire for patients with subacromial pain syndrome
- Leg muscle strength is reduced and is associated with physical quality of life in Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis
- Borderline tumours of the ovary: Common practice in the Netherlands
- A Weighted Genetic Risk Score Predicts Surgical Recurrence Independent of High-Risk Clinical Features in Dupuytren's Disease
- Identifying critical process steps to protein stability during spray drying using a vibrating mesh or a two-fluid nozzle
- Driving next-generation autophagy researchers towards translation (DRIVE), an international PhD training program on autophagy
- Active smoking and macrocytosis in the general population: Two population-based cohort studies
- Effect of self-monitoring through experience sampling on emotion differentiation in depression
- Development and construct validation of a parent-proxy quality of life instrument in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia aged 4-8 years old
Most Used Journals
Adaptive devices in young people with upper limb reduction deficiencies: Use and satisfaction.
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb 12;
Authors: Vasluian E, van Wijk I, Dijkstra PU, Reinders-Messelink HA, van der Sluis CK
Objective: To evaluate use of, satisfaction with, and social adjustment with adaptive devices compared with prostheses in young people with upper limb reduction deficiencies. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 218 young people with upper limb reduction deficiencies (age range 2-20 years) and their parents. A questionnaire was used to evaluate participants’ characteristics, difficulties encountered, and preferred solutions for activities, use satisfaction, and social adjustment with adaptive devices vs prostheses. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology and a subscale of Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales were used. Results: Of 218 participants, 58% were boys, 87% had transversal upper limb reduction deficiencies, 76% with past/present use of adaptive devices and 37% with past/present use of prostheses. Young people (> 50%) had difficulties in performing activities. Of 360 adaptive devices, 43% were used for self-care (using cutlery), 28% for mobility (riding a bicycle) and 5% for leisure activities. Prostheses were used for self-care (4%), mobility (9%), communication (3%), recreation and leisure (6%) and work/employment (4%). The preferred solution for difficult activities was using unaffected and affected arms/hands and other body parts (> 60%), adaptive devices (< 48%) and prostheses (< 9%). Satisfaction and social adjustment with adaptive devices were greater than with prostheses (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Young people with upper limb reduction deficiencies are satisfied and socially well-adjusted with adaptive devices. Adaptive devices are good alternatives to prostheses.
PMID: 25678192 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]