- Respiratory level tracking with visual biofeedback for consistent breath-hold level with potential application in image-guided interventions
- Non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved ejection fraction
- The 2018 correlative microscopy techniques roadmap
- Considering the biology of late recurrences in selecting patients for extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer
- Enhanced cognitive behavioural therapy for patients with eating disorders: A systematic review
- Fish Intake, Circulating Mercury and Mortality in Renal Transplant Recipients
- Association Between Subjective Tinnitus and Cervical Spine or Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review
- Reliability and predictive validity of the Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment neurological scale
- Hatha yoga for acute, chronic and/or treatment-resistant mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- A Close Examination of the Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Depressive Symptoms
Most Used Journals
Wheelchair-specific fitness of inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury.
J Rehabil Med. 2015 Jan 16;
Authors: van der Scheer JW, de Groot S, Tepper M, Gobets D, Veeger DH, van der Woude LH
Objectives: To describe wheelchair-specific anaerobic work capacity, isometric strength and peak aerobic work capacity of physically inactive people with long-term spinal cord injury using outcomes of tests that are feasible for use in rehabilitation centres, and to determine associations among these fitness components. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury for at least 10 years, who were inactive based on a norm score of a physical activity questionnaire (n = 29; 22 men; 20 with paraplegia; median age 53 years). Methods: Participants performed 3 exercise tests in their own wheelchair to determine: highest 5-s power output over 15-m overground sprinting (P5-15m); highest 3-s isometric push-force (Fiso); and peak power output (POpeak) and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) over a peak test. Results: Median (interquartile range) was in P5-15m 16.1 W (9.4-20.9); in Fiso 399 N (284-610); in POpeak 40.9 W (19.1-54.9); and in VO2peak 1.26 l/min (0.80-1.67). Correlations among outcomes of fitness components were weak (r = 0.50-0.67, p < 0.01), except for P5-15m with POpeak (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). Conclusion: All fitness components measured in this sample were at relatively low levels, implying a specific need for interventions to improve wheelchair-specific fitness. The weak-to-moderate associations among components imply that separate tests should be used when monitoring wheelchair-specific fitness in rehabilitation centres.
PMID: 25594246 [PubMed – as supplied by publisher]